Publication date: Available online 4 January 2018
Source:Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
Author(s): Boda Kang, Jonathan Ziveyi
In this paper we analyse how the policyholder surrender behaviour is influenced by changes in various sources of risk impacting a variable annuity (VA) contract embedded with a guaranteed minimum maturity benefit rider that can be surrendered anytime prior to maturity. We model the underlying mutual fund dynamics by combining a Heston (1993) stochastic volatility model together with a Hull and White (1990) stochastic interest rate process. The model is able to capture the smile/skew often observed on equity option markets (Grzelak and Oosterlee, 2011) as well as the influence of the interest rates on the early surrender decisions as noted from our analysis. The annuity provider charges management fees which are proportional to the level of the mutual fund as a way of funding the VA contract. To determine the optimal surrender decisions, we present the problem as a 4-dimensional free-boundary partial differential equation (PDE) which is then solved efficiently by the method of lines (MOL) approach. The MOL algorithm facilitates simultaneous computation of the prices, fair management fees, optimal surrender boundaries and hedge ratios of the variable annuity contract as part of the solution at no additional computational cost. A comprehensive analysis on the impact of various risk factors in influencing the policyholder’s surrender behaviour is carried out, highlighting the significance of both stochastic volatility and interest rate parameters in influencing the policyholder’s surrender behaviour. With the aid of the hedge ratios obtained from the MOL, we construct an effective dynamic hedging strategy to mitigate the provider’s risk and compare different hedging performances when the policyholders’ surrender behaviour is either optimal or sub-optimal.
Source:Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
Author(s): Boda Kang, Jonathan Ziveyi